How to Use the JWT "aud" Claim Securely

As developers, you're already familiar with JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) and their role in secure data transmission. Among the standard claims in a JWT, the aud (audience) claim is often misunderstood and misused. This is a surprisingly common mistake we’ve encountered—in fact, we recently helped a large customer overhaul their token validation logic after discovering they were misusing the JWT aud claim for role management.

We’re using this opportunity to further help the developer community avoid these mistakes in the future by sharing insights and best practices. This article dives deeper into the proper use of the aud claim and highlights why repurposing it can lead to security flaws, implementation issues, and unnecessary complexity in your systems.

What is aud in JWT?

The JWT aud claim exists to specify the intended recipient(s) of a JWT. Its purpose is straightforward: ensure that only the designated service or API processes the token. Without this claim, a token could be improperly accepted by unintended recipients, leading to potential vulnerabilities. As outlined in RFC 7519, Section 4.1.3, the aud claim is critical for audience validation, ensuring the token is used as intended. For example, a typical JWT might look like this:

In this example, the aud claim ensures that the token is valid only for https://api.example.com. Any other service receiving this token should immediately reject it as invalid. This behavior is critical for maintaining security and avoiding token misuse.

However, the simplicity of the aud claim often leads to it being misinterpreted or overloaded with unrelated responsibilities, creating unintended consequences.

Common misstep: using aud in JWT for roles

One of the most frequent mistakes is using the aud claim to represent roles, permissions, or access scopes. For example, a developer might include values like admin or user in the aud field, assuming it’s a convenient way to encode roles or specify access levels:

At first glance, this approach might seem logical, but it introduces significant issues:

1. Breaks specification: The aud claim is explicitly designed for audience validation—to ensure the token is used by the correct service. Overloading it with role or permission data violates the JWT standard and creates ambiguity.

2. Validation confusion: APIs or services relying on aud for validation may fail or produce unpredictable results when given values like admin instead of a proper audience identifier, such as a URL or service name.

3. Security vulnerabilities: By mixing roles and audience validation in the same claim, you increase the likelihood of errors in your authorization logic. This could inadvertently grant access to unauthorized users or services.

4. Scalability challenges: Roles and permissions are often dynamic and subject to change. Using the aud claim for these purposes ties your system’s functionality to a claim that should remain static and predictable, making future updates more difficult and error-prone.

Proper handling of roles and permissions

To avoid these pitfalls, roles and permissions should be defined using dedicated claims, such as role, roles, or scope. This approach maintains a clear separation of concerns and ensures that the aud claim is used only for audience validation. For instance:

By isolating roles and permissions in their own claim, you achieve several benefits:

• Clarity: The aud claim remains dedicated to its original purpose, making token validation straightforward and unambiguous.

• Scalability: Roles and permissions can be updated or extended without impacting audience validation logic.

• Maintainability: Your code and system architecture become easier to understand and maintain, reducing the risk of introducing bugs or security vulnerabilities.

Why misusing aud claims in JWTs matters

Misusing the JWT aud claim can lead to several problems, including:

• Failed token validation: If the aud claim doesn’t match the expected value, the token will be rejected by the intended service, potentially causing disruptions.

• Compromised security: Overloading the aud claim increases the risk of errors in your authorization logic, leaving your system vulnerable to misuse.

• Interoperability issues: Other services or tools expecting standard-compliant JWTs may reject your tokens if the aud claim is improperly formatted or used.

• Increased complexity: Mixing multiple responsibilities into a single claim creates unnecessary complexity, making your system harder to debug and scale.

By adhering to the JWT specification and maintaining a clear separation of concerns, you can build more secure, reliable, and future-proof systems.

Best practices for developers

To ensure proper use of the aud claim and avoid common pitfalls, follow these best practices:

1. Use aud for audience validation only: Validate the aud claim against the identifier or URL of your API or service to ensure the token is being used by the intended recipient.

2. Separate roles and permissions into dedicated claims: Use claims like roles or scope to handle role-based access control and authorization logic.

3. Follow JWT standards: Adhere to the JWT specification to ensure your tokens are compatible with other systems and services.

4. Implement clear validation logic: Keep audience validation and authorization logic separate to reduce complexity and minimize the risk of errors.

5. Educate your team: Ensure that all team members understand the purpose of standard JWT claims and the importance of using them correctly.

Final thoughts

The JWT aud claim is a foundational component of JWTs, ensuring that tokens are processed only by their intended recipients. Misusing it for roles or permissions undermines its purpose and introduces unnecessary risks and complexity into your system. By leveraging dedicated claims for roles and permissions, you can maintain a clear separation of concerns and build systems that are secure, scalable, and easy to maintain.

As developers, it’s essential to use the right tools for the right tasks. The aud claim has a specific purpose—audience validation. By respecting this purpose and adhering to best practices, you can avoid common pitfalls and create robust, standards-compliant applications.

For more security tidbits from the world of authentication and customer identity, subscribe to our blog or follow us on LinkedIn.